Transcript

2019-06-21_ted_mahr

Out of This World Radio 1150 AM in Bellevue, Washington

Friday, June 21, 2019

Ted asks Simon about his speaking engagement at Kerry Cassidy’s “Awake & Aware” conference in High Elms to be held June 22–23; Trump orders missile strike on Iran and then cancels it ten minutes before the scheduled strike; power poles that fell in domino effect in Seattle caused power outage to some of the Boeing offices; human colonies on Mars; was helicopter crash on top of midtown office building between 51st and 52nd Street on 7th Avenue a message to Trump, as Trump Tower is only one-half mile from crash, or an honest accident, or a message to someone else; how many assassination attempts on Trump and family have there been; President Trump’s gold tie is symbol saying he thinks America is over the worst of potential financial collapse; will Mexico help curb the illegal immigration pouring into America; JFK Jr. and look-alike Vincent Fusca; Special Forces doing mock exercises in downtown LA, video looks like real deal; Julian Assange’s extradition; power outage in Argentina and Uruguay; Iran announces it will exceed agreed upon amount of radioactive materials output; before Mohamed Morsi could testify he collapsed (as in murdered) in the courtroom; possible cause of Angela Merkel filmed shaking uncontrollably; thoughts on the ever elusive Q; what will 5G rollout at Glastonbury Festival do to those attending; Poland bans 5G for entire country; were entertainers like Janis Joplin, Jimi Hendrix, Jim Morrison suicided; how to remember abduction or visitation experience; the what-if dream ticket, JFK Jr. and Mr. Trump or his son.

[SIMON INTERVIEW STARTS at 05:48 Hour 1]

Ted Mahr: And with that I’d like to introduce my, bring on my good friend Simon, Simon Parkes from England. We’re both in the same country tonight. Simon, how are you doing tonight?

Simon Parkes: Hello Ted, I’m doing very well, thank you. And as you’re in Britain, I’ll give a British time: it’s ten minutes past ten.

TM: That’s right, that’s right. And it is the Summer Solstice. We did a water ceremony yesterday with a bunch of beautiful people at Cleopatra’s Tower, Obelisk actually, on the Thames River yesterday, and I recorded it and we will be playing that ceremony, which we did, on the program at about, in the next hour at about 3:10 Seattle time or about 11:11 p.m. here in England. And Simon, you’re going to an event this weekend with Kerry Cassidy. Where is that going to be held and how can people go?

SP: Well, it’s a place called High Elms. It’s north of London, High Wickham [?]. I think it’s also sold out, but you could check on the website, so just go to Kerry Cassidy’s website. So it’s running tomorrow, Saturday and Sunday, and I’m speaking on the Sunday, and there are some really good speakers on the Saturday.

TM: Okay, wonderful, wonderful. Well, I know, people will really enjoy it, Simon, and boy, there’s been a lot going on, hasn’t there? My goodness, all kinds of stuff.

SP: Yeah, yeah, it really has. It’s getting to the point, where it’s almost becoming difficult, to keep up with it.

TM: Yeah, yeah, I know how you feel. Well, I’ve only got about thirty things to talk about tonight, but I don’t know which one to start with first. I guess, we’ll start with your Connecting Consciousness video from June 15th, and you wrote something, you said something very profound. You said that the push for war has never been greater with the oil tankers. Now there are two tankers and a probable missile attack. I’d love to hear any updates on that situation.

SP: Well, it’s interesting Ted because I put these messages out and then I don’t ever go back to them, and so anyway, when we do the show, you know, it’s like you, you said – that is quite good actually – you pull me back to it, and it’s amazing, because I’d actually written, that we were never closer to war. There was a probable missile attack coming, and then what, two hours ago - Two hours ago? Two-and-a-half hours ago? - we learned, that President Trump had authorized a missile attack against Iran and then ten minutes – it’s hitting the major news, you might not have caught it yet – and then ten minutes before the launch he cancelled it. So my intel was correct, because I actually said a few days ago, that we’re gonna launch missiles. And I think it was about four days ago, and indeed they were ten minutes away from it. And I say that’s on the major new channels or breaking with it now. So he authorized the attack, that we expected, but then just literally pulled back from it.

TM: Oh, my goodness. Well, I remember, you said, that also that this was... that there was a two-week window for good things to happen, which was an attempt to be hijacked by the bad guys to destroy this chance. Do you still see that? They’re trying to upset the applecart?

SP: Well, they successfully did derail it, because we’d expected some interesting things to occur while the U.S. president was out of America, and then he did his talk in Ireland and France and then he went back, and then we had another week, and on the Friday, I can’t remember exactly, Thursday or Friday, then the tankers were attacked and there was a spectre of a war, and so I think a lot of things were put on hold, and are on hold, while this situation was dealt with. I think, the president has done remarkably well in reigning in the hawks in the Pentagon and at the White House. I understand, you know, they wanted to hit back. I do appreciate that, but I think, President Trump’s actions were not a sign of weakness. I think, it was a very measured political response. Because what the Iranians know now is: they were ten minutes away from being attacked. So that might have a good diplomatic affect, so let’s just go with it.

TM: Right, right. Well I, you know, I talk to the other side all the time and they and President Kennedy and they all tell me, and he tells me that this, we will not have a war. I mean, we may... They’re trying, I mean, they’re to instigate one, but I still don’t see one happening. I think, cooler heads will prevail, and because most people on this planet, Simon, I think they want peace and they want to make the planet a better place. We’re tired of the old conflict game.

SP: Yes, and I mean, you know, you’re not in America today, but, you know, I think the mood in America is not wanting a war, and I think back to the presidential campaign that Trump ran, and it was very much about war should be a last resort. He’s, you know, he’s stayed true to his election pledge. He’s basically, you know, pulled back on it, which, I think, gives the other side a chance to think.

TM: Absolutely, absolutely. There was something you mentioned on your most recent video that I thought was really interesting, Simon. I wondered – I’ve had several questions on it – the power outage of 26,000 homes in Seattle, and your comment on it was, that it was a message to the bad guys, that their software in new aircraft, to stop any interference. I’d love some updates on that, because that’s a story, which we didn’t hear at all in the U.S.

SP: Oh really? Okay. Well, if you U.S. guys go on YouTube and you go on YouTube, unless they’ve taken the videos down, you should find someone’s done some stuff on the cellphone and just caught some of it, but basically there were more than twenty power poles, which for no apparent reason just literally all fell at the same time. Now, the power company reports, that there was a bit of a wind, but in their own words: there was not enough to bring these power poles down. So we had twenty-odd power poles, that came down domino effect, and somebody did, I understand, I haven’t seen it, but I understand, somebody did capture one of these falling on their cellphone. So that was apparently put on YouTube. Now, whether it is still there I don’t know, but if you go looking for it... And these power poles took power to the Boeing Corporation. That was, you know, one of the main ways that the power was coming through. So when that went down, some of the building that Boeing offices have was put out of action.

TM: How interesting, interesting. Another really interesting comment you made in your video was that about the human colonies on Mars and Alex Collier’s old videos on YouTube from twenty years ago.

SP: Right.

TM: And you also mentioned in a one-sentence line, that people are still being shipped to the moon and Mars. Does that mean, they are being abducted and sent there? Or is this part of the Secret Space Program, which we’re not supposed to know about?

SP: Hum... Both are true. There are people that don’t wanna go there and are hijacked. I think in the old days we called it press-ganging. There were taken, but other people are part of an on-going program, some scientists, military personnel. Yes, so the answer is: both types, Ted.

TM: Interesting, interesting. I would have hoped or would have thought, that the good guys, the benevolent ETs, would have stopped that by now, but...

SP: Well, Ted, but Ted, it’s free will. You know, it’s down to the humans on the planet to stop it.

TM: Oh, I see.

SP: I’ve tried sometimes, it’s very difficult, to try to explain to people on Earth the logic of those people off the Earth, and let me just put it to you like this: There is a small number of people, who run this planet; there is an infinitely large number of people, who live here; and the argument is: well, you guys must want these people to run the show, because if you didn’t, you’d get rid of them. You know, there are eight billion of you allegedly, and maybe a few hundred thousand in control. Well, you must want them there, because you left them there, therefore we’re not going to intervene too much, because you are giving them the right to rule you. And that’s the problem, because remember, as you said, these are good guys and their understanding and knowledge is not subject to the 3rd or the 4th dimension. Their understanding is of a 5th dimension and higher, therefore their concept of freedom is not the same concept that we have here on the Earth, and their loyalty, if you like, to humanity – it drags them in one way, which is: we want to come and help you, but their loyalty to the higher principle of not becoming involved drags them back the other way.

TM: Oh, I see. Okay, all right, Simon. Well, thank you for telling us, for explaining that, because I had some questions on it actually. Boy, there’s so much going on right now. I still say, there’s… Do you see another window of opportunity coming up, where good things could happen? I guess, there always will. Will we get a second chance? A third chance? Another bite of the apple...

SP: I’ve got my conference coming up. I say, it’s my conference – I mean, it’s mine in the sense that for an hour-and-a-half I am speaking at this conference, but it will be my conference for the hour-and-a-half, and it’ll be the other speakers conference when they speak, and I’m gonna be on this. So you have to forgive me, if I don’t be unfair and give too much away.

TM: Okay, that’s fine, sure.

SP: I think, there is another opportunity. All I think is, it’s a delay, so the plans, that have been put into effect, will have been delayed. I don’t believe, they’d been stopped.

TM: Right, right. That’s my feeling too.

SP: Good.

TM: Yeah, yeah, that’s my feeling too. And the other thing – there’s so many interesting things to talk about tonight. On your website you had a... and we’ve got a bunch of emails too. We will get to those questions, I promise you, but you had a piece about the Manhattan helicopter crash on June 11th, which crashed into a tall building in Manhattan, that was only a half-a-mile away from the Trump tower.

SP: Yeah.

TM: No one wonders if there might be a connection. Obviously, I think, there is, but any updates from that?

SP: Very, very tightly, very tight security on that, really, really right. It’s unusual. Generally I get something, but even I’m not getting anything on this, which tells me that it’s not so much... It’s that important. It tells me that, whatever it is, is still ongoing, or it’s linked to something, that is ongoing. Generally, when it’s a standalone something or other, it’s done and dusted and gone and we can talk about it, but if the wraps haven’t come off, Ted, it’s because there’s some unfinished business somewhere. But the news media was just selling the fact, that ‘hey, you know, helicopters do drop out of the sky’ and et cetera, et cetera. Nobody, but nobody, was actually asking ‘hold on a minute, this only, you know, half a mile from Trump Tower’. What’s going on here?

TM: Right.

SP: And, you know, it’s the established media, deliberately blindsiding the truth. And I thought “No, I’m not gonna have that, I’m gonna go actually, because I know something is going on.” I’m gonna make sure that at least, you know, I can get some news out, and hopefully in the coming weeks we’ll get more. But yes, there was a real connection. Whether it was another attack to try and kill the president or whether it was something else, I genuinely don’t know, but it was something that is not being covered.

TM: Yeah, President Kennedy is telling me now, it was an attempt to, behind the scenes, to kill him, but fortunately it was stopped before any harm was done. How many times, roughly, has... Now again, in our media...

SP: I’ll answer the question, Ted. I mean, I have only been given the number six, but other people have told me, it’s into double figures.

TM: Oh, my goodness.

SP: Which is astonishing, absolutely astonishing, and we know, there was one attempt on Trump’s family. Now, that’s why, if members of the audience get the chance to listen to some of President Trump’s conversations, he was doing the talk, where he talked about, you know, the emails on Hillary Clinton’s server.

TM: Right.

SP: And if anyone’s had a chance to watch this one yet, but he said, you know, he said I won’t do it word for word, but he said, you know, he said “If it had been one email, if I’d used my official, you know, computer or laptop, and I’d sent one email” and then he took a moment, and he said a little love note to his wife and everybody laughed, he said: “It would have been the electric chair for Donald Trump”.

TM: Uh-hum, that’s true.

SP: Now that’s coded, that’s coded message. What he’s saying is, he wants the electric chair for Hillary. Now that’s what the coded message there is. President Trump doesn’t say things, just throw them away ‘willy nilly’ we say in Great Britain, he doesn’t just throw words away. He actually thinks about them, so when he said “Oh, that would put Donald Trump in the electric chair”, we know exactly what he was talking about.

TM: Interesting.

SP: So this is why we are getting all this smokescreen going on on this stuff on the side, because they’re trying, to take the president’s attention away from these investigations, that the president has ordered.

TM: Right, right. Well, that makes perfect sense. Yeah, that makes perfect sense. You also, there was something else too, about his gold tie. Did you... There was a piece about that, where he switched his tie. What was the meaning of that, Simon?

SP: Well, I’ll talk about that, but I don’t think... It’s unfair to say, I’ll say a little bit. There has been for many, many years, 20, 30 plus years, where we’ve talked about the potential of the American economy collapsing, and it was called, you know, restructuring or resetting. There was a possible devaluation of the dollar. Now, the reason that President Trump is wearing the gold tie, is because – not because it was just his birthday – but it does look, as if, that America might be in a position now, to prevent this long talked about collapse. It might well be, we’re talking about the gold. It’s... You know, I can’t say that he’s got enough gold X, Y, or Z, but what I can say is, that something happened, which allows certain people in America to feel, that they could now weather any economic storm.

TM: Interesting. Okay, okay, and this goes back to: he doesn’t just throw things out. He doesn’t just wear a gold tie just to wear a gold tie.

SP: No, it’s either blue or red, because that’s the campaigning colors. He has worn the gold tie before, but at the moment the bad guys are sending symbolic actions, and he is replying with symbols, so you need to look at everything, that’s being thrown from one side to the other, and try to read really what they’re saying. So when he wore the gold tie, I think he was saying, that financially America was now over the worst of any potential collapse. You see, Trump doesn’t want an economic collapse, because the vast majority of the money [cough] – excuse me – funding the military is coming from, you know, very bona fide organizations, and if that collapses, they’re won’t gonna get their money. So Trump is very much working to prevent a financial collapse. I know, lots of people wanted the financial collapse, because it would really shake people out of their lethargy and make people really question things.

TM: Right.

SP: But the downside of that would be the trauma and the hardship, that would befall so many people.

TM: Sure, absolutely.

SP: So that’s really he think, he was sending a signal, that he felt, America was just about okay now.

TM: Wow. Well good, okay, thank you for explaining that. You also had a blurb… I got a lot… I’m trying, to get through as many things as I can tonight, Simon, so forgive me.

SP: Sure, that’s fine.

TM: There’s a lot of things, things sent, but yeah... On June 9th you had a little blurb on your website about Mexico caving in, seizing the accounts of people trafficking individuals, and signing a deal, whereby all the illegal immigrants were returned to Mexico, and then that meant, that a five percent imports duty imposed by the president would not now go into affect. Any updates from that?

SP: Well, I think, what we can just say is, that it makes an absolute mockery – unfortunately, but it’s true – of well-meaning people. You have said, you know, how cruel it is, to lock these migrants up and, you know, there are people seeking work, and all this. The reality is, that when President Trump said to the Mexican government: “I’ll give you so many hours to stop this; otherwise I’m gonna hit you, where it hurts, i.e. your economy.” And somehow the Mexican government was able to shut down the bank accounts of key people traffickers. So what that tells us is two things: first of all the Mexican government was fully aware of who these people were. That’s why they were able to shut down their bank accounts. And secondly it shows, that this isn’t individual families, desperate, hungry, starving, wanting work. It is organized by these game masters, who will go around, because they’re paid. Someone’s paying them to do this. So what the evidence shows us, is that even at the lowest point the Mexican government must have been involved, because they were able to shut down the bank accounts of these individuals. And the only way they would know that, is if they were in conversation with them. And so what Trump’s done, is called their bluff and he said: “Okay, fine, do this, but I will start to hit your economy, and you can’t afford the United States of America to financially attack you.” And so Mexico caved in, as we knew they would.

TM: Wow, that is just amazing. Thank you for explaining that. I don’t think anybody in their right mind condones drug dealing and child trafficking in the United States, but there are people, who are not in their right mind. And that’s... But thank you for explaining that. I really appreciate it. You had some fascinating videos on your website. I have to tell you, I really enjoyed listening to them, watching them. About a Vincent Fusca, F-U-S-C-A, and where his face and that of JFK Jr. were like superimposed with each other, along with the video of a Special Forces in Los Angeles, hazmat suits, and a video tape of soldiers, who disappear. Now, when that happened, it must have been last month, some weeks ago, I got several emails asking me, it wasn’t a question directed at you, Simon, I guess, I should have asked it, but asking, what was going on and if I had heard about it, and I hadn’t heard a thing. What more, if anything, have you heard about Vincent Fusca and the Special Forces video in Los Angeles?

SP: Well, that’s two different things, isn’t it?

TM: Yeah.

SP: The Vincent is an ongoing interesting thing. The jury is out as to whether he is, you know, somebody special or whether he’s not, and that’s gonna be the subject of my talk on Sunday, one of the subjects. In terms of the operations, it is interesting, because some years ago Al Jazeera, the Arab TV station, aired a video tape of American troops in operation either in Afghanistan or in Iraq, and I can’t remember which, but they did show an American soldier appearing to disappear. So that wouldn’t be the first time that film being shown of American troops with some form of stealth technology. That’s the first.

The second thing is, that the local community supposedly had been warned, that the military were undertaking a training operation, which is just nonsense, because you don’t fly a helicopter down a main street and drop soldiers down. That’s just not a training operation. But nevertheless the police blocked off the roads, the helicopters flew in, dropped troops down. There were some explosions, that went off, and some objects were carried out of a building. So it was... No way was that a training operation. It was Special Forces, good guys, going after a stash of something very bad, hidden in the building.

TM: It was… I think, it was called the Guatemalan Culture Center, next to a law firm there.

SP: [unintelligible]

TM: Yeah, yeah and if it was a biological weapon it could have caused – and it was active – it could have caused presumably a lot of damage in the Los Angeles area, so I’m glad that they got it. Why – I’m just curious, Simon – why do they have to keep everything so secret to us? They act, they treat us like children sometimes, where they can’t disclose it.

SP: You mean, why are the good guys are not telling you? You know, this is one of my bugbears, if you like. It’s because: two things – well, I’m not saying I agree. I’m just going to answer the question.

TM: Sure.

SP: Because they fear mass panic, absolute mass panic. Because if they were to announce the fact, that there was some very evil people, very powerful, that they were playing cat and mouse with, that would really destabilize America. That’s the first, and the second point is, that the evil people are incredibly powerful still, and if the good guys went and made this public, it would mean, that the bad guys had no option but to do their worst. So while there’s still cards being dealt under the table, rather than on the table, it means the audience, who are watching the card game, are not seeing the shenanigans, the chicanery going on. They think, it’s all okay, but really both sides are trying to outdo each other by fiddling cards under the table.

TM: It’s a little bit like the explanation for Roswell in 1947, where the government claimed later, that it was a weather balloon, that came down and...

SP: I’m going to do a little bit of that. I can’t resist it. I’m going to do some of that on my talk on Sunday, simply because, of course, you have 4th of July coming up very soon, and of course the Roswell incident was around the 4th of July.

TM: That’s right, it was. It was. Good memory, good memory, Simon. Good memory. There was another article and another very important story about Julian Assange is to be extradited to the U.S., and you wrote that this was more positive than being extradited on the rape allegations.

SP: Yes.

TM: What do you think will happen to him, when he comes to the U.S.?

SP: Right, well, I’d some weeks ago before, you know, I’d said, that the key point to look for was: would he be extradited to the U.S. or Sweden, which is where they both stuck in extradition orders. The Swedish had and the American had, and I said, depending on where he goes is going to tell you a great deal. Now he’s going to America, which is very positive for Assange. Let us assume, that he hasn’t spilled all the beans. Let us assume, that Assange still has something up his sleeve. If that’s the case, President Trump wants to know, what that is.

TM: Interesting. Okay, okay. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you for explaining that. There was something else again, not in our North American media, but a power outage. A serious power outage in Argentina and Uruguay has plunged hundreds of thousands without power. That’s on June 16th. Any updates from that?

SP: Well, what’s happening is, they are fighting over the president there, a movement to get rid of him and there’s a movement to keep him, and there’s no coincidence, that it occurred on an election. It wasn’t the elections, that were important. It’s just the fact, that it had more effect. So you’ve got the usual, the good guys and the bad guys fighting over this power outage. The only reason, I think, it went into Uruguay was simply, because some of the power stations on the border supply both Argentina and Uruguay, so Uruguay was not the target, but it had a knock on effect.

TM: Okay, okay. Do you think the outage was caused by a weather balloon like in Roswell in 1947?

SP: No, it was caused by advanced technology, not unlike that which brought down the power cables, the power poles, your local power poles, it was the same technology that was used.

TM: Oh, how interesting. Okay, thank you for putting two and two together, Simon, dotting the i’s and crossing the t’s. There was another post you had on your website, about, on June 17th, about Iran announcing, that they will exceed the amount of uranium, that they were stipulated by deal to domestically produce, and if they do this... Oh yeah, right, this fits in early what you were talking about, more than the tankers though. This is another, it’s a kind of a separate issue.

SP: Well, I’ve been busy, haven’t I?

TM: You have. You’ve been busy, absolutely, yeah. You’ve been busy.

SP: I think, I wrote on that one. I think I wrote quite openly: has Iran gone mad? I think, I wrote: I can’t understand, if any country in the world makes an arrangement to produce a certain amount of radioactive material, and then publicly goes out and says: hey, we’re going to exceed that, because we don’t care. You’ve either got a death wish or you are playing for such high stakes, and you’re convinced, that you’ve got a chance of winning. I mean, it’s just utter madness, because never mind America, I’m telling everyone this now, but if they did go ahead and do that, it will be Israel that attacks them, because – there’s a track record here – because it was Israel, that attacked Iraq. In the 1980s Israel bombed a factory or a power station, that was being built to make nuclear material.

TM: Right.

SP: If Iran gets anyway near making a nuclear bomb, you know, even if America does nothing, the Israelis will. That’s for sure.

TM: Interesting, interesting.

SP: So I said, what I said: Iran must be going mad, because it’s no sense at all.

TM: Right, yeah. Does… And Iran has their hardliners too, I guess? I mean… it must.

SP: Two groups. The highest cleric, he’s actually the guy in charge, but interestingly enough he’s not Satanically controlled. He’s like the ayatollah. He’s the top man in the religious side, but Iran has a president, and the president is much more part of the Cabal. Hard to grasp, but... So you’ve got this religious leader, who is so deeply religious, that he’s not actually... Because remember, the pope is not particularly religious. You could say: “Well, the pope is very religious, therefore wouldn’t be involved in the worldly concerns”, but of course the pope is. Now this guy in Iran, he’s not involved with the worldly concerns. So he’s actually, believe it or not, quite independent. But the presidents, who are involved in the politics, are quite difficult. So Iran is split down the middle between the religious side, which is reasonably okay, and the political side, which is pretty awful.

TM: Hum, interesting. Well, thanks for explaining that, Simon. We get, in the U.S. anyway, we don’t get any news at all about what’s going on in Iran.

SP: It’s terrible, that you guys don’t get a bigger picture. It’s awful.

TM: Well, more people watch the cartoon channel than CNN nowadays, but you know, the thing they do, since the cartoon channel has such a big following, if they put news in it, maybe they’d be better off. I don’t know. Anyway, you had another piece on your website Simon about Mohamed Morsi, the ex-president of Egypt, and he was on trial for spying, but he was slated for murder, if he spoke out, and he was going to speak out, and he ended up dying.

SP: Yep.

TM: That was apparently murdered in the courtroom.

SP: Isn’t that amazing? Actually not just dying outside in the street or in a car crash or drowning in his bath, but died actually in the middle of a court case. You are actually in the courthouse and you die. And, I mean, (A), the timing of that is incredible, so whatever they used was instantaneous, and in fact they wanted to send a message to somebody, and they thought, the best way to do that was i.e., if you’re going to go to court and you’re gonna testify against us, this is what’s gonna happen to you.

TM: Hum, wow, yeah.

SP: It’s this thing.

TM: Yeah, very interesting. You had another fascinating post about Chancellor Merkel of Germany on Tuesday, June 18th. That’s where she was filmed having an uncontrollable shaking fit, just as Hitler did the last year of the war.

SP: Yep.

TM: And my question was Parkinson’s disease, and I looked and did some research on Parkinson’s before coming on the show tonight, and it’s believed to involve both genetic and environmental factors, and those with a family member affected are more likely to get the disease themselves. There have been rumors, that Chancellor Merkel is a daughter, one of the daughters, of Adolf Hitler, and any more comments on that? That’s an interesting video.

SP: Well, I mean, it has been widely watched, because it’s, you know, it was filmed by an official, you know, media, because they were there. It was a sort of a state visit. This wasn’t filmed on someone’s cell phone. This was officially filmed. So you can’t refute it. I mean there it is. It’s there in black and white, and the question is: why would suddenly somebody have an uncontrollable fit, you know, unless it was ongoing neurological damage? And I made the point that, in fact actually it was after the battle of Stalingrad in 1942 the great shock – you know, we weren’t there so we don’t know it – but the shock to the psyche of the Nazis at the loss of Stalingrad – you can’t describe it. It was an enormous shock, and Hitler’s left arm started, and his left leg, started to uncontrollably shake from that moment onwards.

TM: Oh wow.

SP: So what happens is, that if someone has it genetically, it is a great strain, trauma, or shock, that activates it. Now, if there are certain leaders around the world, who can feel somebody breathing down their neck to slap some sort of court case on them, then it’s not surprising, that certain people are beginning to crumble under the strain.

TM: Uh-hum, uh-hum, interesting, interesting. Well, thanks for explaining that so much, Simon. Are there any other topics, briefly you’d like to talk about, before we go to listener email?

SP: No, I think I’m worn out. Why don’t we just go on to some questions?

TM: All right, all right, all right. This is an interesting question from Tracey in the Isle of Man, here in the UK. She writes: May I ask Simon for his thoughts on Q? Who does he think the group consists of, how it got started? Is there anything significant going on to be disclosed by them? And who’s the mastermind behind Q? I’ve also had Q on my show, by the way. He’s told me things, that I can talk about, and certain things, that I can’t talk about. So anyway, with that background – that was Tracey’s question from the Isle of Man.

SP: Well, originally it started, because a certain grouping of American government wanted to bypass the normal channels, because they thought, the normal channels wouldn’t cover it. So originally some very accurate and truthful information was got out through certain individuals or certain websites. And, but since then, it has become a bit more of what I’d call a freelance sort of franchise. I’ve always assumed Q to have been a group of people and a super computer. That’s what I’ve always considered it. So, a group of individuals and a super computer, who have a core of genuine information, but I think, others add to that. So we have to be very careful, because what’s coming out – some of it is not accurate, but some of it is, just like everything else on the planet.

TM: I can say this: it is a group of people, but that’s all I can say. Yeah, you’re right. You’re right, Simon. You’re right. I have another question, a gentleman going to the festival in Glastonbury, that starts tomorrow. Glastonbury, as you know, is Britain’s small spiritual center. The big telecom companies are planning doing a full rollout of 5G starting tomorrow in Glastonbury. Is this a good thing? And what will happen to the people, who are there?

SP: No, I don’t believe it is a good thing. I’ve never supported it. I think 5G, just for no other reason, we can simply say, that 5G is not just an upgrade. It is a completely different system, and we know that, because your cell phone won’t work on 5G. You have got to go to the store and you’ve got to trade up to a different model cell phone to get 5G. So that tells us, that this is a completely new technology.

TM: Right.

SP: The difficulty that we have as humans, is that we are biological organisms, and if you are going to do something like this, you really ought to test it on living tissue. Now Poland – American listeners may struggle to know, where Poland is, it’s what we used to call an Eastern European country.

TM: Right.

SP: Poland has banned 5G. The whole country, the whole country has banned 5G.

TM: That’s amazing.

SP: And the rationale behind it was: because there have been no empirical medical tests of what does 5G do to people and it’s a fact. There are no… There’s no science. There’s nothing. So why would you roll something out, if you’ve not tested it? So the question is actually not: Why did Poland ban it? The question is: What strength of determination does the leaders of Poland have, that nobody else has? Why was that government so confident, that they could cancel 5G and not all end up dead? So why are there some leaders, who are quaking in their boots, absolutely terrified to ask these questions? Yet here you go to this – no, I don’t mean to be disrespectful – but an old ex-communist Eastern Bloc, although now it’s a democratic country. Why are they so strong? You know, so there’s something not right. There’s something very wrong with it, and I’ve always said this, that I fear, I fear, and I use that word, I don’t often use that word, but I fear that this product, this 5G will be rolled out and there will be a collateral damage, and they’ll have to turn it off. So, we’ll see.

TM: Yeah, yeah. I agree. I agree. I met a very interesting lovely lady from Edinburgh today outside London, and she can’t live in her house anymore in Edinburgh, because the City Council there in their wisdom has instituted a new 5G system. And she’s a classical music composer, she can’t do her work anymore. The system that she’s got, the 5G is just outside of her house and she says, that it interferes with her, and she can’t do any of her work anymore. And I said: “Well, can you file a claim with or against the government?” She said: “No, you can’t file a claim.” They’ve said, that the National Health Service in Britain has not recognized that EMF – extremely low frequency – radiation from 5G cell towers as being harmful, so you don’t have any recourse, except maybe sell her property. A sad case, but the time of course is, to speak up now against it, before they put it in. But, I’m sure we’ll have more on that in the future, Simon. I received a question from Mary Jane in New Zealand, and she writes: Dear Simon, there was a revolution in the ’60s, and you said, we nearly made it. I’m wondering, if powerful people, who died around the same time, such as Janis Joplin, Jimi Hendrix, and Jim Morrison, were suicided. I’m sorry...

SP: The answer is ‘yes’, because these individuals were focal points for a peaceful revolution, and the CIA, as it was back then, were writing reports, saying that the government of the United States was on the verge of losing control. Basically you had one hand, you had things like the Vietnam War, and then you had this great movement opposing the Vietnam War, and this really affected the politicians. It really affected them. And if you had these key singers, who were singing about peace or singing... Even if they weren’t singing about against the war, they certainly weren’t supporting it, and the result was, that a number of these key people died in tragic circumstances. And also I’ll add, that during this time of the Vietnam War, if you were a filmmaker, you were much more likely to get your television series or your film through with plenty of funding, if you were supporting that concept. And your audience, if they had watched the original ‘Star Trek’, which ran from, I think, about ’66 to about 1969, if you just look at the concept of that, the ‘fire first, ask questions afterward’, and then you look at the more later episodes of the ‘Next Generation’, you can see how everything was about, you know, shooting and then, you know, justifying it afterwards. And so that was the culture, very hard for people, who weren’t living through it and old enough to live through it. And that was the culture of the U.S., and it’s not the culture now.

TM: Right, right. No, I agree. I agree. There’s actually a second part of the question, I’ll read it quickly. In our time, Mary Jane writes from New Zealand, this seems to be happening a lot with Chris Cornell and Chester Bennington, because they were exposing the Satanists and loved by the people. It seems so wrong, that they were remembered as taking their own lives, when in fact they were murdered and their killers go free. Anyway... Yeah, well, thanks for commenting on that. I appreciate it, Simon.

SP: Okay.

TM: Let’s see, there’s a couple more questions have just come in now. Let me get to the next one. This was from Germany, Aynaz. Hi Aynaz, if you are listening now, I know you are. Would you kindly ask Simon this question: I’m a lucid dreamer and I always get to see my future. I’m also very telepathic and know about people’s intentions, this in similar situations. I constantly see aliens, reaching me in one of my dreams. They purportedly wanted me to know, that they are here to talk to me. It goes up in spacecraft, and they talk to him, they land in front of him and come out and talk to him. Much of the information is lost. They’ve taken my DNA once and asked for my permission, before doing so. Question: Would you suggest for me to work this out in order to remember the details? Do they purposely clear my memory about their visitations? Many thanks and love and light from Hannover, Germany.

SP: All right, thank you. It’s a very simple answer. And that is: you have to be cognizant enough, when they take you, to actually say these words to them: “I wish to remember. It’s my body. I have a right to remember.” I’ll repeat that: “I wish to remember. This is my body. I have a right to remember.” And if you do that, I’m not saying you’ll remember everything, but you will remember a fair bit, But you have to tell them, that you wish to remember, and if they are working with you and they value you, they will have to comply with that wish.

TM: Hum, okay, all right. And I think, a good thing to do, is to follow your heart. If it doesn’t feel right, then certainly don’t go along with whatever they’re trying to do.

SP: Well, listening, understanding that question, that person has no problem with what’s going on. This person hasn’t been harmed. They’re obviously working reasonably well with them. What the person wants, is to understand why. This woman wants to know, what’s going on, what’s it all about, and she’s fishing at that point, but she’s not being harmed. So for her knowledge is strength, knowledge is power, and for her to remember and come back. And if she comes back and remembers, that they’ve hurt her, then she knows what’s going on, but if she comes back and she remembers something more interesting, that’s not a pain, then she can begin to follow the narrative. Knowledge is power, it’s very important. People, you know, they have their own sovereignty and they say “I want to know what’s going on”.

TM: This is... ah, yeah absolutely. Thanks for mentioning that, Simon. We’ve got a few minutes left and I want to go back to JFK Jr. The question, that the video asked, or you asked: Would JFK Jr. run alongside Mr. Trump?

SP: Yes.

TM: And/or would Mr. Trump’s son run with JFK Jr.? Any updates on that? That’s interesting, interesting questions.

SP: It’s a very interesting question, isn’t it? I’m gonna be talking about that on Sunday, but what I would say is, that if, if, if John F. Kennedy Jr. was alive, and you know, if he was alive, then it would be a very powerful ticket, because you would pull in voters from all political persuasions.

TM: Right.

SP: So it would definitely be a dream team, but, of course, if John F. Kennedy Jr. is physically not on the planet, it can’t happen, can it? But if it were to happen, then, you know, we could be sure, that they would be elected.

TM: Right, right, yeah absolutely, absolutely. We’ve got about two minutes left Simon, two-and-a-half minutes left and I want to give you the rest of the time...

SP: I don’t, no my friend, I have nothing further to say.

TM: Okay.

SP: Thank you, it’s just, that there is so much happening.

TM: Yeah.

SP: And I think, I would ask Americans, please, to pray for your president.

TM: Okay.

SP: Pray for him to give him the strength, to resist certain people around him, who want to bomb the bits out of certain countries. So just send some prayers to your president. I don’t care, whether you are a Democrat or a Republican. He is your president, and it’s very important, that he makes a decision, that is good for the people of the United States of America.

TM: Uh-hum. Absolutely, absolutely, Simon. Well, Simon as always thank you so much for coming on. Simon will be on my show again on July 5th, which is just after 4th of July.

SP: Good, good.

TM: And... Or... Yeah, the 5th, and I will be broadcasting live from Mt. Shasta during that time. I’ll be going down to Mt. Shasta in a very short amount of time, and the people from Mt. Shasta, Adama and the people of the Hollow Earth said, they would give me another miracle healing. I lost ten percent hearing in my right ear in a car accident years ago, and they said they would restore it to me, so I’m very much looking forward to the trip, so... Simon, thank you so much for all your wonderful work, and again for coming on my show today, and I hope, that you have a wonderful time at Kerry Cassidy’s conference this weekend. It sounds like a wonderful time.

SP: Thank you for having me. God bless.

TM: Okay, thank you, Simon, so much. Have a wonderful day, my friend. All right, bye-bye. Bye.

[END OF SIMON INTERVIEW 54:12 1st Hour]

Transcribed by GSC June 24, 2019

Proofread by TS July 3, 2019

2019-06-21_ted_mahr Page 17 of 17