Transcript

2019-11-01_ted_mahr

Out of This World Radio 1150: Current Events, Questions & Answers


Friday, November 1, 2019

A worldwide meditation is called for the California and Australian fires; rumor of November 3rd Seattle event unfounded; Deutsche Bank wobble; UK general election to settle Brexit; Britain’s relationship with Europe; importance of Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi’s role; what is future of repressive Chinese government; Chinese government passes law requiring Chinese nationals, whether inside or outside of China, to spy in the workplace and send info back to China; US intelligence discover chips in U.S. government computers downloading info and phoning it home every night to China; many parts of China have only electronic currency and government controls people’s bank accounts; Chinese face tight surveillance with facial recognition software; Chinese military is a force to be reckoned with; Australia is in danger of being subjugated to Chinese political influence as China buys up parts of Australia; Obama sold Long Beach port in California to Chinese and Trump persuades them to sell it to another country to prevent Chinese control of U.S. ports; Netanyahu’s network is falling apart; millions spent on Mueller investigation to accomplish absolutely nothing; Democrats are using impeachment process as last ditch effort to prevent Trump from winning 2020 election.

[SIMON INTERVIEW STARTS at 02:51 Hour 1]

Ted Mahr: And with that I’d like to bring on my good friend Simon from England. We have so much to talk about. Simon how are you doing today?

Simon Parkes: Hello Ted, I’m fine.

TM: Oh good. Good.

SP: So I’m fine. Ted you sound like you have a bit of a cold.

TM: Well to be honest with you Simon, I’m in the tail end of bronchitis. I’m almost over it now. I’ve been on medication. And you told me before to take a break and I didn’t, and so if you don’t pay attention, then your body will take a break for you. And that’s what she did. She took a break for me and I am feeling better. I’m almost at the end of my medication, but I decided to take off. I’ll still be doing my radio show the rest of the year but I’ll be taking time off for the rest of the year to get some much needed rest and relaxation that I’ve needed for several years.

SP: I’m glad to hear that Ted. I’m sure the audience will forgive you when you cough. They’ll understand, that you’re coughing because you’re being a brave soldier and carrying on.

TM: Thank you Simon for saying that. I almost didn’t do my show today, but you know, I’ve worked hard to get to this point in life and it’s the sixth anniversary of both my radio show and it’s my birthday tomorrow too, so I said well I can’t miss this so I decided to go ahead and have the show.

SP: I’m sure, I’m sure, listen hang on, I’m sure lots of people tomorrow will be wishing you a happy birthday Ted.

TM: Oh well thank you. Thank you so much Simon for saying that. I really appreciate it. I also want to thank the Mt. Shasta library here in beautiful Mt. Shasta, California. They have been extremely gracious to me. They’ve just given me a bunch of cough drops and a cup of coffee and all kinds of things, little goodies to keep me going today. So I can’t thank them enough for all their help, but I want to thank you Simon for that wonderful meditation that you will be doing tomorrow for both California and Australia. That’s at 10:00 p.m. Greenwich Mean Time, is that right?

SP: Yes 10:00 p.m. tomorrow, Saturday, Greenwich Mean Time, which for the U.S. will be, depending on the time zones, will be in the afternoon and for Australia it will be at morning, so check on that time because it’s doable on both continents. One is for the fires in Australia which suddenly just started and the other is for the fires in California which have restarted. So one meditation will be for both because it’s both about the fires. You know, your loving prayers, your loving energy will work in California because it doesn’t matter. It’s the same issue.

TM: Right. Well I’m close to boots on the ground here. We don’t have any fires right in the Shasta area, but it’s not that far away where there are fires going on. And I have been able to talk to locals here who know people in those areas, and actually there was a report, a video tape of just yesterday Simon of a… it looked like something out of the Vietnam War, where they had these fires, like they had these fire guns Simon where they were shooting fire across the hills just outside of Los Angeles near the Getty Museum, and that was not natural. Somebody was using that to actually instigate fires on this hillside. It’s called the Getty fire and I don’t know what happened as the result but there was a whole video of it, and there were other reports of that, of actually the area right around it’s, oh where is it, it’s north of San Francisco, Sonoma where somebody was spraying all kinds of fire accelerant in the atmosphere the last two weeks so that when these fires started they went up like a match everywhere. So a lot of these fires aren’t natural Simon. I don’t know what you are hearing there but this is what I’m hearing here on boots on the ground close to where the fires are happening here in California.

SP: All right Ted. I think that it’s always California that gets hit, and that’s something that can’t be got away from. California is the go to state if you want to start a fire. Think of all the chemtrailing, all the aluminum which is falling to the ground and that acts like a reflector, so whenever there’s any heat it actually means that it catches fire faster. I’ve had a number of reports just like you have about these anything from a helicopter to a flying saucer, but basically they’re seeing fire coming out, and this is adaptive of that good guys shooting at the Cabal, bad guys shooting at good guys. The point is that innocent people, innocent Californians are dying and getting injured, and this has got to stop.

TM: Right.

SP: That’s why I’m doing the meditation because we’ve got to mobilize the group to stop this.

TM: I agree with you completely Simon and I’m so happy you’re asking for a worldwide meditation Simon. What all my listeners, let’s see I think tomorrow 10:00 p.m. Greenwich Mean Time is 3:00 p.m. in Los Angeles or 3:00 p.m. in Seattle. Of course that would be 3:00 p.m. in LA that would be 6:00 p.m. in New York, 5:00 p.m. in Chicago, so we can do it. We can do it throughout the United States and bring a meditation around. How has the meditation been for the Amazon fires by the way?

SP: Yeah just backtrack a bit. I chose that time because it was a Saturday and people, you know, were less likely to be at work and so might get to do it. I’ve got three (cough) excuse me, I’m catching your cold.

TM: I hope not. I hope not Simon.

SP: I’ve got three active members, when I say active I mean they continually write to me in South America who are on the periphery of the Amazon, and they reported the last time we did a meditation, what they said was the amount of smoke drifting across appreciably stopped, and that’s why the main media have dropped, you know, it’s not a big story anymore.

TM: Oh.

SP: Now some people would say oh well that’s just a coincidence. Simon’s group did a meditation and [10:19][coughover]. The point is when good people do a meditation then Source or God or whatever you want to call it, hears that call. Source hears that call, and I think that when Source hears that call it responds. So I don’t care if it’s the winds that change or there’s rains. Something happened as long as it reduces…

TM: Sure.

SP: ...and that’s what we really need to do for California and Australia. I’ve got my coordinator in Australia. She is my main outlet because, you know, my original Australian coordinator, he resigned, and we’ve got a replacement in now, and she, her home is one mile from the fire, and the power...

TM: Oh my goodness.

SP: ...the power company’s turned off the service to her house, and then the firefighters were there and they turned the power back on again, so, you know, we’re all a big family, we’re all a family, and so what affects one of us affects all of us.

TM: Right, right. Exactly, exactly. Have they determined the cause for the Australian fires Simon? I mean these...

SP: No, no. You mean officially, no, there isn’t anything official yet. They haven’t put a story out. We’ll wait for the official story to come out and then we’ll see what it is.

TM: Um-hum. I wanted to tell you I want to thank you so much for your earlier podcast this week. I watched it, regarding the, something an alleged event happening in Seattle on November 3rd, and I got a couple of emails from listeners last night asking me to mention this on the air today with you, and also asking for a meditation for peace and calm with that. I personally Simon I don’t see anything happening in Seattle on November 3rd. It’s a beautiful city. I don’t see any problems but I may be wrong, but I think it’s always good of course to send out good, lots of good energy and love and light so that nothing does happen.

SP: Well I won’t be doing a meditation for Seattle at the moment simply because I want the focus on these fires. But what I can say...

TM: Sure.

SP: ...is that the Seattle... right, let’s backtrack a bit. There was a huge hype a few days ago that there was gonna be multiple explosions across Europe, nuclear facilities were going to be targeted, cities were going to be targeted, and this caught on like wildfire and went right across the internet. Lots of social media sites were carrying it. Now I received the same information I guess from the same source that others did, but I was very suspicious of that information and I did not receive confirmation so I didn’t call it. All I did on my website was just repeat and say this is what’s being said but I can’t call it, because I don’t have information, and I’m jolly glad that I didn’t. I’d have felt [13:40][coughover] and said it and nothing occurred. But the Seattle one…

TM: Right.

SP: ...I have a concern for Seattle in December, so next month.

TM: Okay. Okay.

SP: So, but looking at that obviously and if we need a meditation we will. But Seattle, I never expected anything at this stage. I never saw anything, but I believe there is a slight possibility of something in December, but we’ll look into that.

TM: Um-hum, um-hum. Well thanks so much for mentioning it. Of course this is where I live of course. It’s a beautiful area, a lot of good people here. I think if we’re vigilant and if we send lots of love and light out, it’ll definitely help turn the tide and so we don’t have to deal with disasters, and I think I don’t know how you feel. I know you feel this way too Simon, but like if people think that an event, a negative event is going to happen that can also help, you know, create the energy for something bad to happen, so it’s always good to remain positive, and send lots of love and light to a situation like the Amazon fires, for example, that could, you know, and I know that your meditation helped help that situation down there.

SP: I totally agree and I think lots of your listeners will agree. That is why I did not add my personal energy or the organization I created, Connecting Consciousness, we didn’t back this. Frankly in my mind it was very much a fear-based, all these explosions, et cetera, et cetera, because I just didn’t see it. It just wasn’t there and I wasn’t going to feed the fire, and that’s not meant as a joke. But I mean I wasn’t [going to] because even people who consider themselves spiritual don’t [15:40][coughover] that if you buy into something you actually give it the oomph, as we say in Great Britain, the energy to keep moving.

TM: Sure, sure, absolutely, absolutely, absolutely. Well I’ll be boots on the ground here for you Simon, and if anything that I do find out that’s significant, I’ll sure let you know. Yeah, I’ll sure let you know.

SP: Thank you Ted.

TM: Yeah, I’ll sure let you know. Yeah. You mentioned in your post, I was able to review your post about the Deutsche Bank wobble. Could you go into that a little bit, what’s happening to Deutsche Bank.

SP: Sure, sure. It’s been… I wouldn’t say it’s a favorite topic of mine. I think it’s a favorite topic of many people who have been predicting some form economic agenda to some sort of realteration or restructuring. There has been a very interesting issue with the Israeli embassies all closing down for a period of time right across the globe, and at the same time information coming there is a financial issue on the way a little bit graver, greater than the Lehman of 2008, but on the positive side, it would be very narrowly focused. So in other words there are signs now that there is an acceptance among certain elite people that there has to be some form of financial alteration, and one of the key markers of that will be Deutsche Bank because it is the lynchpin for Europe, and you couldn’t have a financial restructuring without something happening to Deutsche Bank. So all eyes should be on Deutsche Bank for the next four to six weeks. Let’s see what happens because whilst the establishment news won’t cover the truth, they have to cover anything that happens to Deutsche, and if something happens to Deutsche don’t please think that’s a negative thing. Be more aware that there is rebalancing going on...

TM: Sure.

SP: ...predominately coming from the U.S. and from the Asian market and Europe is sort of caught in the middle, so keep an eye on Deutsche. I think there might be some very interesting news in the few weeks to come.

TM: Do you think long term, do you think the evil actually will survive? They’ve had all these troubles and all that brings in also to into the UK general election and Brexit as well.

SP: As long as smaller countries feel they need a bigger country to protect them, they will always want to join some sort of club or union and as long as the country is getting more out of it than they put in, they’ll always want it. Now when Great Britain leaves the European Union, I have no doubt that they will, you know, we will. That means every other country’s got to find more money to fill the gap, and that’s when you’ll find other countries starting to complain because the amount of money they’re paying in will be greater than the money they get back. So that’s the first point. The second point is there’s a very good luck that there’s a general election in Great Britain and that’s to be over the top of December because we couldn’t go on any longer. We don’t have a dynamic. It’s not moving. [In Wales they] have a proposed presentation system. They’ve got a long history of having gotten, they just can’t do anything anyway, and Great Britain was always seen as the country that produced strong government. Well it would be very difficult for us, so I’m delighted that finally we are going to have an election.

TM: Interesting. Interesting. Who do you think will come on top finally? Is it hard to tell Simon? Who do you think is going to win?

SP: Uh I’m absolutely convinced that the Conservative Party under the present Prime Minister will not only win but will win by quite a large margin.

TM: Um-hum. Interesting, interesting.

SP: That Brexit will happen. There’s so many dynamics, and you know if anybody is interested then they can write a question to my podcast, and you know, but for this show I’m talking to Americans and many other people around the world that the dynamics of the politics within Britain is the most complicated that I’ve seen for thirty-odd years, and therefore it isn’t just a straight understanding, but I’ve looked at everything and in fact today, I was looking at the situation and I actually think that there is only one result and that will be the Boris Johnson backing with a working majority, which means that Great Britain will leave the European Union before the end of January, 2020, unless of course, something really big happens to shake up my calculation.

TM: I was traveling in Europe earlier this year Simon giving some presentations in London and as well as in Germany. I’ll never forget when I was flying from Frankfurt back to London. I was leaving Germany and I just happened to ask some German customs officials about Brexit and all they did was roll their eyes. They got real big and rolled their eyes, so but people have been complaining about that it’s gonna cause border problems. I don’t think it will actually. I think people will get along. I mean they did before, before the European Union didn’t they. They got along just fine.

SP: I’m old enough to remember before Britain was in the European Union and we had a most excellent relationship with America, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, all the countries that weren’t a part of Europe, and then when we joined Europe, we were banned from those countries and that’s a great shame, but there’s one key point here. The Brexit argument in Great Britain is not unlike the argument between do you like President Trump or do you hate President Trump, but the one key…

TM: Oh interesting.

SP: …point here in Great Britain that many people who are passionate believers in staying in the European Union, one thing they haven’t understood is that there are a number of people senior in Europe who now don’t want Britain. They are now just heartily sick of the politics, particularly the French, and I think I wouldn’t be going too far to say that the French want rid of Great Britain. In other words, although the budget would take a massive hit when Britain comes out, because we pay so much in, I think that the freedom to not have to deal with Britain is a price they’re worth paying. So there are a lot of people in my country who would go running up to you…

TM: Hum.

SP: ...as [23:05][unintelligible] and they might be very disappointed that the way that the European begins to push saying look, please we don’t want you anymore, and I think that’s something that has [23:17][inaudible].

TM: Well that’s an interesting concept as an American for me to hear that Simon, to say that the freedom from dealing with the British, how funny. Is it because they they don’t like the UK politics? Is that part of it or…

SP: No you see the point is that Great Britain is an island, and all people, I mean think about Long Island. People who live on an island tend to be very independent. They tend to don’t tell me what to do, and the problem with Great Britain is that the last time we were ever invaded successfully, beaten was in the year 1066, so for a thousand years Britain has never been beaten in a war. Now think about that.

TM: Wow, wow.

SP: [overtalk] In that [thousand] years nobody has come over...

TM: That’s amazing.

SP: ...and beaten this country. So British people tend to be a bit like the Americans, and don’t take this the wrong way please, but quite sure of themselves, quite confident, and I think other countries who have continually been beaten or invaded or what have you, they don’t know how to handle the British, and that’s why Britain’s natural friend is America. Now that seems odd if you think [overtalk]

TM: Um-hum.

SP: ...how we all started with the 1776, and all the rest of it but reality...

TM: Sure.

SP: ...is that Britain and America are natural allies much more than any other European country.

TM: Um-hum. That makes sense. Yeah. That makes sense, looking for historical and geographic, yeah. That makes a lot of sense Simon. Thank you for …

SP: I mean if you think in the war of Independence it was the French that actually worked quite well with the American, I’m not going to call you rebels. Let’s call it...

TM: Um-hum. You can call us rebels, that’s fine.

SP: No, no, not that at all, because then no.

TM: Yeah.

SP: The people who always should have owned America, let me put it to you like that, but what happened was that the French that the Americans found that they couldn’t over the years, they couldn’t deal with the French. They couldn’t make deals that the French would hold to and so they, the Americans, even to this day have been very cautious with the French. Now what they found with the British is you can sit down with the British on Monday and the Brits will still be dealing in the same way a week later. So over the modern history naturally the two countries came together, which means of course that we have very American–British attitude, and a lot of our European neighbors can’t stand that from us, so we’ve always, we’ve always been difficult. You know if you look at it we’ve always been at war with one European country or another over the last 500 years.

TM: Um-hum, Um-hum. Fascinating. Fascinating. Excuse me Simon I got to cough.

SP: Of course you have. Don’t worry Ted, that’s why I figured you weren’t well.

TM: Sorry my friend. I’m almost over this, almost over this, almost over this, yeah, almost over this. You had another post on your website about I hope I pronounced this guy’s name right, Abu, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi.

SP: That’s right. Just say Bakr.

TM: Yeah, yeah, Bakr, okay Bakr, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. How important was he and how is it important now that he’s dead?

SP: Right, he was much more important than anybody realized outside of the group shall we say. He was a great organizer. The point about Bakr was that he was able to organize in a way that men from that region were not able to, and he was a great coordinator, and President Trump spoke the truth when he said that he was [27:43][inaudible] off with people coming into his office and saying hey, we got rid of this one; we got rid of that one, and Trump is reported on record as saying yeah, but I don’t know who they are. What about what about this Bakr guy and...

TM: Yeah.

SP: ...he then basically, Trump that is, basically said to his men you’ve got to make this man a target because if I look at the what they call the caliphate, the actual empire that was...

TM Right.

SP: [28:15][overtalk] he said this was the guy behind it. Why aren’t we doing it, so I don’t know if your audience are aware but 19 million dollars was offered to anybody who could locate this person and I will say...

TM: Wow!

SP: ...that the CIA worked with Kurdish fighters on the ground. I hope I’m not breaking... going to give any names away, so there’s no problem, you know.

TM: That’s okay. You can make it cryptic, it’s fine.

SP: Well I won’t because I, you know, I need to protect everyone and the...

TM: Sure.

SP: ...CIA worked with the Kurdish fighters.

TM: Um-hum.

SP: The British fighters infiltrated a guy right in to this guy’s inner circle and that’s how it all happened. So…

TM: Wow.

SP: ...it wasn’t, this is the funny part. I say funny. It wasn’t down to billions of dollars of spy technology. It wasn’t down to spy cameras. It was down to good old-fashioned detective work, boots on the ground so...

TM: Wow!

SP: ...for all of the huge power of the United States, and I’m not being disrespectful, for all the huge power…

TM: Um-hum.

SP: ...they had they couldn’t [29:27][inaudible], they had to go down on the ground to do it, which just is a good solid lesson for everybody that technology is no replacement for men and women and the work they do.

TM: Well that’s true absolutely, absolutely. Thanks for explaining that Simon. I’ve had several questions come in from listeners about China and of course the Chinese government is a, some say it’s a repressive government and with the rising vibration of the planet however they probably won’t survive. What’s your take on the Chinese government over this short-, medium-, long-term?

SP: On the short-term is they will dig their nails in. They’re going to resist very very very tenaciously, and in explaining I cast your listeners minds back to 1989–1990, when the Berlin Wall came down. The very last government leader to fall was a guy called Ceausescu and the reason that he was so hard to get, apart from deals that were being struck sideways, was his secret police force. Now when an organization has very strong control of the leaders of power, they’re very hard to pry out. When in 1979 the Shah of Iran was removed by the revolution, they were able to do so because the guys that the Shah relied on were not happy. They were unhappy. The point in China is that a lot of people believe themselves to be happy when truly they’re not, and that is the real accolade to propaganda where you tell a group of people who are downtrodden and very unhappy that actually they [31:29][inaudible]

TM: Um-hum.

SP: ...and that’s…

TM: Um-hum.

SP: So what [31:32][inaudible] China will change, but they will be one of the last countries to do so, but they can’t stop the change, and it will just take a bit longer.

TM: Sure, understandable. Isn’t that the whole point of George Orwell’s 1984 Simon, where everyone is kind of brainwashed and they’re all sort of like, like smiling zombies, you know?

SP: Well in George Orwell’s book, the difficulty there we need to put across is that what some animals are equal, but more, but some animals are more equal than others, and what we saw before the end of communism and what was the Soviet Union was that all the diplomats, all the government officials who were telling the workers to live off potatoes and a handful of bread, you know, they all had television or cable. They had these excellent mansions, and so when you’ve got corruption, you have dissent, and where you have dissent you have the power for change. Now we’ve seen it in Hong Kong. Hong Kong is part of...

TM: Right.

SP: ...China, although it does have more liberal [overtalk]…

TM: Right.

SP: ...but what China must be absolutely terrified of is that infection as they would see it…

TM: Right.

SP: ...spreading to mainland China, and that is why they’re determined to bottle up Hong Kong. They don’t want that liberation view to come across to the mainland, but you see the thing is in the modern age you can’t shut it, it’s not like the day of the telephone and the letter and that’s it. With the wave of the internet a lot of people in China are very unhappy and they’re looking at Hong Kong and thinking, hey they’re getting the laws changed…

TM: Um-hum.

SP: So let’s see where we go with it.

TM: Um-hum.

SP: I’m actually like you, I’m hopeful. Short-term [33:28][inaudible] medium-term [coughover]. Cough Ted.

TM: I agree with you, yeah. Thank you my friend. I agree with you Simon and I had a report last week actually that the Chinese Parliament just passed a law requiring all Chinese nationals, whether in China or outside of the country, whether they’re working for example for a British company or an American company, a Canadian company, a European company that directing them to spy on their employer and to send confidential and steal state secrets if necessary, intellectual property secrets, and send it back to China. Have you heard anything about that new law that was passed?

SP: I haven’t heard that one, but there’s no coincidence that President Trump basically has said that he’s not happy with China being involved in any technology that has any bearing on American defense. You know think of all the [34:34][inaudible]...

TM: Right.

SP: …electronic equipment, which much of it had come from China, you know, it really has.

TM: Um-hum.

SP: ...and with the way...

TM: Um-hum.

SP: ...things are going President Trump is saying I’m not very happy about that, and we’re seeing the problems with [this].

TM: All, yeah. Right. This source that I came in contact recently also told me that if you look at the motherboards of all the computers made in the United States like Hewlett-Packard, Acer, they’ve got a microchip in the motherboard itself Simon, which is something like negative 50 microns. It is extremely small but it phones home, they told me it phones home every night to China. It can easily download whatever is on your computer, send it back to a master computer in China, and they can track you if they want, and this is something that was just recently discovered by some intelligence agencies here in the United States and they didn’t even know it was happening. They saw the computers. for example, in these intelligence agencies in D.C. active late at night and nobody could figure out why until they started using like a microscope, an electron microscope Simon, and they would go into the motherboard, and they’d see these little chips that the Chinese had put in to all these sensitive computers, and they’re all sending the information back to China every night.

SP: Well it shows that the Americans have the same technology as China or better, because I haven’t heard that Ted, but it shows that if the Americans subjected the motherboard to an electron microscope or a very high powered microscope that tells me that the Americans also have the same technology and that’s exactly [36:29][inaudible], so I take comfort from that, because it means that the Americans are not caught out. I think what it shows is was that they, if this true, and I [36:37][inaudible] is that they did not...

TM: Um-hum.

SP: ...expect a supposed ally, because they’re not at war with China. They didn’t expect a supposed ally to be doing that in machines or hardware or software or anything like that and then selling it…

TM: Right.

SP: ...to the American government. It’s a breach in trust that’s gone. That’s the problem. There’s no trust now…

TM: Right.

SP: ...between America and China, and that is why…

TM: Um-hum.

SP: ...one of the reasons why President Trump stuck the tariffs on, because he was basically saying to the Chinese, [you] overstepped the mark. Just quickly…

TM: Yeah.

SP: This I know is true. I’ve had this and I know this is that maybe…

TM: Um-hum.

SP: ...listeners Ted, don’t realize that in many parts of China, there is no money. There’s no cash. You are only allowed electronic currency, and I think most of your audience will be shocked when I tell them that the government has access to everyone’s bank account in China. Now this is the story and it’s deadly proof. A guy...

TM: Um-hum.

SP: ...jaywalked in China and…

TM: Um-hum.

SP: ...it’s the face recognition cameras in China so, you know, you get your photograph taken by one of these cameras on the sidewalk. It passes that across…

TM: Hum.

SP: ...to [the state] and it automatically tells them who you are and where you live, but it does more than that in China. It actually gives you straight to the bank account. Anyway they fined him the equivalent of $30, so it’s not a lot but...

TM: Oh wow.

SP: ...that’s what Chinese people, it fined him the equivalent…

TM: Sure, sure.

SP: ...of $30 for jaywalking, but you know what?

TM: Oh wow.

SP: It had come out of the bank account before he’d even crossed to get to the other part of the sidewalk, so there was no court case. There was no letter.

TM: Oh my God.

SP: They just accessed his bank account…

TM: Um-hum.

SP: …took the money out, and by the time he’d crossed the road and got on to the other sidewalk, his bank account had been deducted the equivalent of $30. Now there was a meeting here in Great Britain and some people from Google, and they were asked this and they were genuinely shocked, and they said there’s no way we have created this technology to be used in this fashion, and so the interviewer said to them, yes but don’t you think a government will just do what China’s done, and these guys, these big captains of industry were absolutely stumped, because they...

TM: Sure.

SP: ...just assumed the government would put all the dots together and do it. Now that’s happening in China now.

TM: Wow.

SP: So no wonder President Trump, no wonder President Trump is pushing back against them, because it shows...

TM: Sure.

SP: ...you Americans and we British, we don’t want that coming to our country anytime soon.

TM: Right, right. Our values are different than that of course and it would be nice if the… that’s the importance of my program and you’re Connecting Consciousness Simon, of getting the word out, of getting the other side of the story out, because if you just listen to the mass media in the United States and probably Britain as well, you don’t get the full story, and then they paint Trump, for example, as being nuts, and yet there are valid reasons sometimes for what he does, what he does, so if you understand the full background, then it makes it much easier to understand his decisions.

SP: Right and what... let’s split this a bit, because one of the reasons the Chinese are the way they are is that if we go back to the Second World War and prior to the Second World War when the Japanese, the Japanese invaded China, although Japan is a very small country with a very small population, they were relatively successful because the Chinese population was very disheartened and was quite agricultural and backward and so…

TM: Right.

SP: ...the Chinese are absolutely determined to get on, put that all behind themselves, and to not ever be in that position again, and so that is why, I don’t know if you have a chance, but I watch, every year I watch the Russian and the Chinese military parades...

TM: Sure.

SP: ...and the Chinese parade is a very interesting one to watch because…

TM: Um-hum.

SP: ...you then see soldiers with conviction. There’s a difference between what we call asphalt soldiers, meaning those that just parade up and down on a piece of tarmac or asphalt. There’s a difference between that and people who...

TM: Um-hum.

SP: ...and what the Chinese are now is nothing like the army it was 20-30 years ago. It’s a force to be reckoned with. That is why President Trump has a very difficult position to move, and I think he’s playing it right because he does not want to antagonize China, but at the same time...

TM: Sure.

SP: ...he doesn’t want America to be taken over by it, so I will just finish off by saying my fears are for Australia because the Chinese are buying heavily into Australia. They own large corporations or parts of corporations. They own real estate. They are dots. If Australia is not careful the Chinese will be able to exert a huge amount of political influence on them in the next five years.

TM: I agree with you totally, and I’ve heard that too, actually from friends in Australia, where they have a tremendous amount of political influence down there.

SP: Right.

TM: And it’s insidious because people don’t even realize it’s happening. I think the Chinese have even tried it in the United States as well, politically influence here.

SP: Well I’ll just quickly come in Ted and save your throat. The port…

TM: Okay, thank you.

SP: ...pleasure. The port in California that, it slipped my mind at the moment, but that was bought under President Obama by the Chinese government, and I know for a fact…

TM: Oh great.

SP: ...that’s what happened, oh there’s good new though. President Trump said look here all of these freight ships, all these container ships are owned by China. If China also owns all the ports then, they’ve got a stranglehold on us, because not only do they own all the shipping, but they own where they dock. We can’t have that. So it’s not been widely reported, but your audience can go and do some due diligence on this, but President Trump somehow, goodness knows how he did it, he sold, he got the Chinese to sell the port they owned in California to another country, so Trump is actually distancing himself and distancing or unlocking America from China’s control. So that’s pivotal, that he actually got the Chinese to give back or sell back the port, and he sold it to another country, so those people—we call them white hats—they’re actually in the know…

TM: Um-hum.

SP: ...of close to losing democracy certain countries were about three years ago.

TM: Hum. Fascinating. Well thank you for explaining that. I know that I’d heard years ago that the Panama Canal was actually owned by a Chinese company. Is that right? Is that still true?

SP: You know I don’t know that they own it. I think they’ve got lots of shares in it. I don’t know if it’s a controlling share, but I know that they invested heavily in it simply because they then would be in a position to pinch it off or close it off because they…

TM: Sure.

SP: ...could then [?create an] economic boon, but I’m not sure if it’s 100 percent control or just 40-, 50-, 60-percent of it.

TM: Why would any U.S. government knowingly allow a country like China to control 40 to 50 percent of that strategic shipping lane is beyond me frankly Simon, but...

SP: Well because until very recently America was not only broke privately, it was broke publicly and under the time of Obama…

TM: Um-hum.

SP: ...he was desperate to get foreign currency in and would do almost anything to bring foreign currency in which had some value, and so that’s why.

TM: Um-hum.

SP: He wasn’t the only president. There was the Bush before him, but basically…

TM: Um-hum.

SP: ...they were trying to get real money in, and the Chinese don’t want paper dollars, but they do infrastructure. They want buildings, and so they, the Chinese, always went for real estate over paper money because that’s where they saw value. But of course...

TM: Sure.

SP: ...if you do that enough you find, you know, you’re like you have to circle the wagons, because basically everyone’s surrounding you and you’re cut off, and that’s how America was becoming, and that’s why the military—the United States military—became so concerned three, four, five years ago, because they saw America being economically isolated, not militarily…

TM: Umm.

SP: ...but economically isolated.

TM: Um-hum.

SP: One of the [46:26][coughover] [that Trump did] because they wanted apparently to push back against what they saw was foreign intervention.

TM: Um-hum. Wow, that makes good sense, yeah, yeah. Simon we’ve got about seven minutes left, seven, eight minutes left…

SP: Okay.

TM: ...and I want to give you the rest of the time to talk about whatever topics you’d like to talk about my friend.

SP: Sure, I think that this is the most active time I’ve seen for about five years, and what I mean by that is although on the media it doesn’t seem that monumental, the stuff going on that sadly is not mentioned by the mainstream media is phenomenal. There is such a lot going on on the economic front, on the military front, and I’m quite heartened by the way that certain people are losing their positions. If you look at Israel the prime…

TM: Um-hum.

SP: ...minister for goodness knows how long, Benjamin Netanyahu lost the...

TM: Um-hum.

SP: ...election, and has been unable to form a government, so his president has gone to the next man and said can you form a government. Now with Netanyahu no longer prime minister a lot of…

TM: Um-hum.

SP: ...things that he held together, the great network that he controlled, not just in Israel, but outside of Israel, that will begin to fall apart.

TM: Um-hum.

SP: We saw it as an analogy here with the Clinton Foundation when Hillary was running for president.

TM: Um-hum.

SP: Lots of countries…

TM: Right.

SP: ...gave very large amounts of money to the Clinton Foundation. Supposedly...

TM: Um-hum.

SP: ...for philanthropic or charitable reasons, and then when she failed to win, they all stopped paying in, and I actually asked the question...

TM: Um-hum.

SP: ...well if it’s a charity it shouldn’t matter if it’s social work. It shouldn’t matter who’s the president. You’re giving to the cause.

TM: That’s right.

SP: The very fact that they stopped was because two reasons I believe. One, because Hillary Clinton couldn’t pay them back if she wasn’t president how could…

TM: Um-hum.

SP: ...she afford them, and secondly...

TM: Right.

SP: ...almost as if, not blackmail that’s too strong a word, but almost a case of...

TM: Um-hum.

SP: ...well she’s not in power so we are released now, and that…

TM: Um-hum.

SP: ...was the big wake up call because I will give to charity regardless of who is my prime minister, because the...

TM: Sure.

SP: ...Hillary Clinton Foundation, and the very fact that the official records show that the amount of money donated to the Clinton Foundation has just dropped through the bottom, and it’s very suspicious.

TM: Right.

SP: So there are changes going on in government which I think will have some great benefit. I’m really hoping that there’s going to be more transparency this month in November from your government in relation to some of the issues. If we look at this impeachment inquiry and remember of course…

TM: Um-hum.

SP: ...that the House hasn’t actually voted for impeachment. What they voted for is to make public their discussions about impeachment.

TM: Um-hum.

SP: And that’s the key point, because non-Americans don’t understand that generally speaking. So we have a situation where there is no impeachment process, just talking and I think that as all this goes on, the more it’s going to play into the hands of Republicans because at some point this wagon that, you know, it’s not just the Democrats, but the…

TM: Um-hum.

SP: ...anti-Trump brigade, the wheels are going to come off this, and there’s going to be some serious questions asked by the public as to well what the heck was the point? How many millions have you spent on this inquiry to do what? Absolutely nothing. Really we’re not talking about a man who’s done this or done that, we’re talking about an American who has...

TM: Right.

SP: ... been totally open. So all I’m saying here Ted is that there’s some big things and not very far away.

TM: Yeah I agree. I think people are already asking questions about the so-called Mueller investigation. Why we did it? All this money wasted with no results, so I think people... yeah, I think you’re right Simon. People are already starting to ask about it.

SP: Well you see it’s very sad because whether it’s right or wrong, it doesn’t matter. The argument that President Trump is using is a powerful one. His argument is…

TM: Um-hum.

SP: ...hey you can’t beat me at the ballot box. You can’t beat me at the polls, so you’re gonna impeach me. Now that’s a very powerful argument on countering that, so what I’m saying is that I’m predicting President Trump will be reelected in November, 2020, with a bigger majority and it’s looking to me at this stage, a long way to go. It’s looking to me that he could take back the house. Now…

TM: Um-hum.

SP: if that’s the case, there will be a lot of people will have to go through the shredding machines the night after the election...

TM: Um-hum.

SP: ...because the Republicans are going to come after them.

TM: Sure, sure, that’s true. Yeah. Absolutely, absolutely. It’s gonna be an interesting time. We have about two minutes left Simon and I’d love to have you wrap up your wonderful interview today.

SP: Well I’ll just make it personal and say I’ve always been worried about you Ted, because the amount of work you do, you put out more than you take into yourself, and that’s called service to others, but the problem is if we don’t look after ourselves and we then are…

TM: Um-hum.

SP: ...not fully fit, we’re actually doing a disservice to the very people that we’re here to serve, so that’s why I always said to you…

TM: Um-hum.

SP: ...take some breaks. Take some breaks. Take some breaks, because I can see a general collapse because you are giving more and you need to take something in. So let this bit of a health issue with you now be a lesson so that you are a little bit more caring about yourself.

TM: Okay, thank you Simon. I’m gonna take that to heed. I’m going to take that to heed, I really will.

SP: Well I don’t think there’s many people, Ted, I don’t think there’s many people that give it to you straight. I don’t think there’s many people, but you and I’ve met each other more than once. We know each other very well.

TM: Right.

SP: And, you know, people like you, me, and lots of others did not come here; we did not come here to fall at the final hurdle. Now we have…

TM: Right.

SP: … a physical body. The soul is unbreakable, but the physical body is, and you’ve got to look after yourself because there’s more to come. The battle is still to be won.

TM: Yeah.

SP: So it’s no good if you’re lying in a bed coughing.

TM: Yeah, thank you. Thank you Simon.

SP: Pleasure.

TM: I’ll be taking the rest of the year off. I’ll still do my show, but thank you so much for coming on today my friend. I appreciate you so much. Thank you Simon.

SP: God bless, take care. Bye-bye.

TM: Thank you. Thank you my friend. Please stay tuned friends. Thank you so much Simon.

[Tape Ends 54:14 1st Hour]

Transcribed by GSC November 13, 2019

Proofread by

2019-11-01_ted_mahr Page 20 of 20